Justices on the ballot
Sunday, July 19, 2026
By Diane Hettrick
It would list the candidate and link to endorsements and articles, without making a recommendation.
I started to recreate their work and gave up pretty quickly. But I was shocked at the clear division that immediately emerged.
I received a list of endorsements from the Washington State Republican party. I found the Seattle Times endorsements. There were no matches between the two. I tried unsuccessfully to find endorsements from the Washington State Democrats, so I checked the local organizations. Again there were no matches.
There is an interesting page with history of each candidate's rise to office: Full Court Press click the link that says "See the races"
The League of Women Voters of Washington conducted interviews with each candidate, which can be viewed here.
Here's what I found:
Dave Larson WAGOP
Here's what I found:
Position 1:
Dave Larson WAGOP
Todd Bloom WAGOP
Position 4, will appear on the November general election ballot.
Ian Burke
Sean O'Donnell
Because only two candidates filed for Position 4, they will not appear on the primary ballot.
For voters looking to learn more about the candidates and the court, Full Court Press has launched a dedicated website resource at www.wasupremecourt.org. - Click the box that says "See the Races."
Additionally, because judicial races are non-partisan, only races with three or more candidates appear on a Primary ballot
For voters looking to learn more about the candidates and the court, Full Court Press has launched a dedicated website resource at www.wasupremecourt.org. - Click the box that says "See the Races."
Additionally, because judicial races are non-partisan, only races with three or more candidates appear on a Primary ballot
For the Superior Court, if a single candidate files, they are deemed elected after candidate filing ends in May.














4 comments:
And if one is concerned about seeming lawlessness and lack of consequences for those that commit crimes in our area, much of the online chatter references judges that are too lenient. It's very challenging for me to discriminate how a judge is following sentencing guidelines and erring on the low-end or high-end of available applicable laws.
Thank you, Diane - you are SO RIGHT. It seems next to impossible for a voting citizen to make an informed choice about the judiciary. Simply picking a 'notable name' does not seem right.
Diane, Thank you! for this resource. Voting for the judges is always the most difficult part of the ballot for me.
Thank you for this article.
Post a Comment