Showing posts sorted by relevance for query northshore fire ballot. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query northshore fire ballot. Sort by date Show all posts

Northshore Fire benefit charge passing overwhelmingly

Wednesday, April 24, 2013


The Northshore Fire District measure on Tuesday’s ballot was passing overwhelmingly in returns posted Tuesday night.

Voters in Lake Forest Park, Kenmore and the rest of the District were giving the six-year continuation of a benefit charge an 88 percent “yes” vote, well ahead of the required 60 percent. 

More results from the election will come Wednesday afternoon. 

Read more...

Election results: first count November 7, 2023

Tuesday, November 7, 2023

By Diane Hettrick

King county elections released the first results at 8:15pm on Tuesday, November 7, 2023. 20% of the ballots have been counted.

Many of the races are over - many positions with incumbents had no challengers. So let's run down the list:

√ Assessor: John Wilson - incumbent, no challenger 
√ Director of Elections: Julie Wise - incumbent, challenger's platform was that elections were tampered with
√ Judges: incumbents, no challengers
√ Port of Seattle Pos 2: Sam Cho - incumbent, no challenger
√ Port of Seattle Pos 5: Fred Fellerman, incumbent with 71% of the vote

√ Shoreline Council Pos 2: Keith Scully, incumbent, no challenger
√ Shoreline Council Pos 6: Betsy Robertson, incumbent, no challenger
- Shoreline Council Pos 4: 
  • Doris McConnell, incumbent 3,410 votes
  • Annette Ademasu, challenger 3,740 votes
Lake Forest Park has some interesting results for a first count. We'll see how it plays out over the next few days. With 24% of the ballots counted:
  • Mayor: Recently retired Deputy Mayor Tom French has a commanding lead over incumbent Jeff Johnson with 67% of the vote.
  • √  Council Pos 2: Incumbent Lorri Bodi did voters the courtesy of running a full campaign, even though she had no challengers.
  • √  Council Pos 4: This open seat has Ellyn Saunders with 2,034 votes to Nigel Keiffer's 371.
  • Council Pos 6: Paula Goode leads Stephanie Angelis by 191 votes.
Town of Woodway (Snohomish County): Three incumbent town councilmembers ran unopposed:
  • √  John Brock, James Willett, Elizabeth Mitchell
Kenmore has four city council seats on the ballot. Only one seat is open and all incumbents have challengers.
  • Pos 1: Incumbent Melanie O'Cain has 59% of the vote against challenger Kara Macias
  • Pos 3: In the only open seat, Valerie Sasson leads Josh Kurchinka by 288 votes
  • Pos 5: Long-time incumbent David Baker leads challenger Jon Culver by 115 votes
  • Pos 7: Challenger Nathan Loutsis leads incumbent Corina Phfeil by 168 votes
Special district elections

Northshore Fire Board of Commissioners (King County Fire Protection District 16)
  • √  Eric Adman, incumbent, no challengers
Shoreline Fire Department
  • Commissioner Pos 1: Barb Sullivan, incumbent, leads challenger Larry Hadland
  • √  Commissioner Position No. 4, David M. Harris, incumbent, no challengers
Lake Forest Park Water District 
  • √  Commissioner Pos No. 1: David A. Hammond, incumbent, no challengers
North City Water District
  • √  Commissioner Pos 1: Ronald F. (Ron) Ricker, incumbent, no challengers
Highlands Sewer District 
  • √  Commissioner Pos 1: L. David Hanower, incumbent, no challengers
Northshore Utility District
  • √ Commissioner Pos 1: Trudy C. Rolla, incumbent, no challengers
  • √  Commissioner Pos 5: Suzanne Greathouse, incumbent, no challengers
  • Commissioner Pos 3:
    • Bruce Gardiner, incumbent 64% of the vote
    • Steve Hamilton, challenger 34%

Read more...

Northshore Fire District officials thank voters for approving benefit charge in April election

Sunday, June 16, 2013


Officials of the Northshore Fire Protection District have issued thanks to District voters for their overwhelming approval of the benefit-charge renewal on the April 23 special-election ballot.

Final results certified in mid-May showed that the measure got approval on more than 88 percent of ballots cast by voters in Lake Forest Park, Kenmore and nearby unincorporated areas of the District.  


Read more...

Election results Nov 2, 2021 - Special Purpose Districts - Shoreline and Lake Forest Park

Tuesday, November 2, 2021

King County Fire Protection District No. 16 aka Northshore Fire
Ballots Counted: 5,595 21.40 % of Registered Voters: 26,146

Commissioner Position No. 3
Tyler Byers     3,562 78.75 % - winner*
Don Ellis        935    20.67 %
Write-in          26       0.57 %
Don Ellis passed away. It was beyond the date to remove his name from the ballot

Commissioner Position No. 5
Nate Herzog       2,185    44.48 %
Lisa Wollum       2,706    55.09 %
Write-in               21          0.43 %

Shoreline Fire Department

Commissioner Position 1
Barb Sullivan - winner*

Commissioner Position 3
Rod Heivilin - winner*

North City Water District
Ballots Counted: 3,408 19.16 % of  Registered Voters: 17,784

Commissioner Position No. 3
Charlotte I. Haines   2,167  73.51 %
Nigel Keiffer               761 25.81 %
Write-in                       20    0.68 %

Northshore Utility District
Ballots Counted: 10,669  19.35 % of Registered Voters: 55,138

Commissioner Position No. 3
David Arthur    3,487 38.03 %
Matt Breysse    5,643 61.54 %
Write-in                 39   0.43 %

*Running unopposed



Read more...

2013 Candidates for office

Monday, May 27, 2013

These candidates have filed for offices that will be on local ballots this year.

Since all local offices in King County are non-partisan, only offices with three or more candidates appear on the August primary ballot. The top two vote getters in the primary advance to the November general election.

Offices that will appear on the primary ballot are King County executive; Metropolitan King County Council member, District 1; Seattle Port Commission, position 3: and Ronald Wastewater Commission, positions 2 and 4.

Positions with only one or two candidates appear only on the November ballot.

2013 Official Candidate Filing

King County Executive
  • Alan E. Lobdell
  • Goodspaceguy
  • Everett A. Stewart
  • Dow Constantine

King County Sheriff
  • John Urquhart

Metropolitan King County Council District 1
(Short and full term)
  • John Fray
  • Naomi Wilson
  • Rod Dembowski

Court of Appeals, Division No, 1, District No. 1
Judge Position No. 3 (unexpired 2-year term)
  • James R. Verellen

King Superior Court
Judge Position No. 20 (unexpired 3-year term)
  • Susan H. Amini

Port of Seattle

Commissioner, Position No. 1
  • Pete Lewis
  • John Creighton

Commissioner, Position 2 (unexpired 2-year term)
  • Courtney Gregoire
  • John Naubert

Commissioner, Position No. 3 (short and full term)
  • Andrew Pilloud
  • Michael Wolfe
  • Stephanie Bowman

Commissioner, Position No. 4
  • Richard Pope
  • Tom Albro

City of Lake Forest Park

Council Position No. 1
  • Jason Colberg
  • Hilda Thompson

Council Position No. 3
  • John Wright

Council Position No. 5
  • Edgar Escandar
  • Mark Phillips

Council Position No. 7
  • Alan Kiest
  • John Resha

City of Shoreline

Council Position No. 1
  • Keith McGlashan

Council Position No. 3
  • Will Hall

Council Position No. 5
  • Shari Winstead

Council Position No. 7
  • Christopher Roberts
  • Michael Javorsky

Shoreline School District No. 412

Director District No. 2
  • Debi Ehrlichman

Director District No. 3
  • David Wilson

Shoreline Fire Department

Commissioner Position No. 2
  • Kimberly Fischer

Commissioner Position No. 5 (Short and full term)
  • Ken Callahan

Northshore Fire Protection District 16

Commissioner Position No. 2
  • Bob Jordan
  • Carolyn Armanini

Commissioner Position No. 4
  • Pat McSweeney
  • Kae Peterson

Lake Forest Park Water District
Commissioner Position No. 2 (Short and full term)
  • Eli Zehner

Shoreline Water District

Commissioner Position No. 2
  • Larry Schoonmaker

Ronald Wastewater District

Commissioner Position No. 2
  • Ginny Scantlebury
  • Arthur Wadekamper
  • Gretchen Atkinson

Commissioner Position No. 4 (Short and full term)
  • Richard Matthews
  • Craig Degginger
  • George R. Webster


Read more...

Filing for local elections ends Friday afternoon with many positions unopposed

Friday, May 19, 2017

Evan Smith
By Evan Smith

Filing for candidates for local offices ends Friday afternoon, with several positions unopposed.

Candidates can register online until 4pm or in person at the King County Elections office in Renton until 4:30pm.

Among unopposed positions​ on the ballot are:
  • three of the four Lake Forest Park City Council positions 
  • two of the four Shoreline City Council positions
  • the one Lake Forest Park Water District Board position
  • the one North City Water District position
  • one of the three Northshore Utility District positions 
  • one Ronald Wastewater District Board position
  • one of the two Shoreline Fire District Board positions

Unopposed Lake Forest Park City Council candidates are incumbents Mark Phillips, John Resha and Samra Riddle

Unopposed Shoreline City Council candidates are incumbents Will Hall and Christopher Roberts.

Shoreline so far has the only contest that will require a primary. It's the position in which incumbent Shari Winstead already has three challengers.

Incumbent King County Councilman Rod Dembowski has yet to file for the position he holds representing Shoreline, Lake Forest Park and the rest of Council District 1. If no one files Friday, there will be a special filing period next week.

Both Shoreline School Board positions on the ballot have two candidates.

Non-partisan positions with three or more candidates appear on the Aug. 1 primary election ballot, with the top two vote getters qualifying for the Nov. 7 general election ballot. Positions with only one or two candidates appear only on the November ballot.

Information for candidates is on the King County Elections page.


Read more...

Sample Ballot: Lake Forest Park

Thursday, October 17, 2013


Sample Ballot: Lake Forest Park

By Evan Smith

Here are issues that will appear on Lake Forest Park ballots for the Nov. 5 general election in addition to statewide and countywide issues that we have posted separately.

Candidates appear in the order they will appear on the ballot.

CITY

City of Lake Forest Park Council Position No. 1

  • Jason Colberg
  • Hilda Thompson

City of Lake Forest Park, Council Pos. No. 3

  • John Wright

City of Lake Forest Park, Council Pos. No. 5

  • Edgar Escandar
  • Mark Phillips


City of Lake Forest Park, Council Pos. No. 7

  • Alan Kiest
  • John Resha


SCHOOL

Shoreline School District No. 412, Director District No. 2

  • Debi Ehrlichman

Shoreline School District No. 412, Director District No. 3

  • David Wilson


SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT

King County Fire Protection District No. 16

Commissioner Position No. 2

  • Bob Jordan
  • Carolyn Armanini

King County Fire Protection District No. 16

Commissioner Position No. 4

  • Pat McSweeney
  • Kae Peterson


Lake Forest Park Water District

Commissioner Position No. 2, short and full term

  • Eli Zehner


Shoreline Water District

Commissioner Position No. 2

  • Larry Schoonmaker


Northshore Utility District, Commissioner Position No. 2

  • Robert S. Peterson

Northshore Utility District, Commissioner Position No. 5

  • Don Ellis


Read more...

Ballots for Feb 12 Special Election have been mailed

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

King County Elections has mailed ballots to about 560,000 registered King county voters for the February 12 special election. The department estimates a 34 percent voter turnout rate.

This special election includes propositions from the Seattle and Renton public school districts. 

Locally, Lake Forest Park and Kenmore voters will have a proposition from Northshore Fire aka King County Fire Protection District No. 16 Proposition No. 1. Benefit Charge Continuation

“We had record-breaking voter turnout in November, but local elections matter too,” said Julie Wise, Director of King County Elections. “This special election will have a direct impact on our communities, so it’s important to vote and return your ballot early.”

Ballots include pre-paid postage so voters do not need a stamp to return their ballots through the mail. Voters can also deposit their ballots into one of 40 ballot drop boxes open for this election. Ballots must be postmarked by February 12 or returned to a drop box by 8pm Election Day.

In-person voter registration deadline Feb. 4

King County citizens not currently registered to vote in Washington can register in person through Monday, February 4. Registration is available from 8:30am to 4:30pm at the at the King County Elections office in Renton and from 8:30am to 1pm and 2pm to 4:30pm at the Elections Annex downtown.


Read more...

VOTE - Tuesday is the deadline

Monday, April 26, 2021

   VOTE!   

Dig your ballot out from under that pile of papers, mark your choice(s), and turn it in.

This is a very consequential election. Lake Forest Park / Kenmore will decide if they want to maintain their Northshore fire department or merge it with Woodinville.

Shoreline voters need to reauthorize a measure to keep funding their Shoreline Fire department and decide whether they want to finish developing their parks over the next 20 years.

Tuesday is the deadline. If you mail it, the postmark has to be no later than Tuesday, April 27, 2021. That means you need to get it in before the last mail pick up of the day and every location has a different time.

If you take it to a dropbox (please do!) you have to get your ballot in the drop box by 8pm, Tuesday, April 27, 2021.

Drop box locations:
  • Shoreline Aurora Park n Ride, 192nd and Aurora
  • Shoreline Library, NE 175th and 5th NE
  • Lake Forest Park City Hall, Town Center, intersection Bothell and Ballinger Way
  • Other locations here
--Diane Hettrick


Read more...

LFP has highest voter turnout in King County – nearly 42%

Saturday, August 27, 2011

By Evan Smith

Lake Forest Park continues to have the highest primary election voter turnout in King County.

The LFP ballot-return rate reached 41.81 percent this week – far ahead of the countywide return rate of 30.69 percent.

Those rates are unlikely to change much between now and the end of ballot counting Wednesday. Only nine ballots arrived from around the County Friday, none from Lake Forest Park.

Ballots arriving at this time are either late ballots from overseas voters or ballots that arrived on time but were returned for signature verification.

LFP voters were choosing candidates in primaries for mayor and for a position on the Northshore Fire District Board in addition to voting on the Countywide veterans and human services levy and on the single-candidate primary for a position on the court of appeals.


Read more...

LFP continues to have highest ballot return rate in King County – now more than 20 percent

Sunday, August 14, 2011

By Evan Smith

Lake Forest Park continued to have the highest ballot return rate in King County in figures released late Friday, with the return rate passing 20 percent of ballots from voters in LFP.

Elections officials expected that about half the final number of ballots would be returned by Friday.

The 20.5 percent return in LFP through late Friday was well ahead of the countywide rate of 17 percent.

LFP voters face primaries for mayor and for a position on the Northshore Fire District Board in addition to voting on the Countywide veterans and human services levy.

Lake Forest Park had the highest turnout of any jurisdiction in King County in last year’s primary, when voters rejected a levy-lid-lift proposal by a 78 percent to 22 percent margin.



Read more...

LFP has highest ballot return in King County - more than 18 percent by Friday afternoon

Saturday, August 13, 2011

By Evan Smith

Lake Forest Park has the highest early ballot return in King County with more than 18 percent of ballots from voters in LFP returned by Friday afternoon.

Elections officials expected that about half the final number of ballots would be returned by Friday.

The 18.4 percent return in LFP through Friday was well ahead of the countywide rate of 15.8 percent.

LFP voters face primaries for mayor and for a position on the Northshore Fire District Board in addition to voting on the Countywide veterans and human services levy.

Lake Forest Park had the highest turnout of any jurisdiction in King County in last year’s primary, when voters rejected a levy-lid-lift proposal by a 78 percent to 22 percent margin.



Read more...

Election Watch: More than half of expected ballots returned before Election Day

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

By Evan Smith

More than half of the expected final number of ballots had arrived at the King County elections office before Election Day.

Elections officials had expected a countywide voter turnout of 52 percent (53 percent in Seattle, 51 percent in the rest of the County), but almost 27 percent of ballots had already arrived at the County elections office Monday night.

Shoreline and Lake Forest Park voters were voting at a slightly higher rate than the rest of the County.

The ballot-return rate was 27.13 percent in the Shoreline School District, compared to the countywide average of 26.81 percent. The return rate was 28.70 percent in Lake Forest Park and 28.70 percent in the City of Shoreline. The return rate for the Northshore Fire District, which includes Lake Forest Park, Kenmore and nearby unincorporated areas, was 27.70 percent.

The return rate was lower in South Snohomish County, where 23.70 percent of ballots in Brier, Edmonds, Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, Woodway and the rest of the Edmonds School District had been returned by late Monday night.

The secretary of state’s office had expected a statewide turnout of 47 percent.


Read more...

Op-Ed: The Ballot Initiatives – From a Human Services Perspective

Sunday, October 17, 2010


Beratta Gomillion is the Executive Director of the Center for Human Services, a community-based, not-for-profit youth and family services agency since 1970, located at 17018 15th NE in Shoreline's North City neighborhood, serving Shoreline and Northshore families.

Op-Ed by Beratta Gomillion
As Executive Director of the Center for Human Services I have analyzed the upcoming ballot’s state and county initiatives with the eyes of how they will impact non-profit human services. The following synopsis contains my personal opinions as a private citizen.

Initiatives 1100 and 1105

These two initiatives were written by large corporations who want to sell liquor. We should be concerned about how these initiatives, if passed, will increase the number of outlets selling hard liquor from the current 315 to at least 3,350 (according to the sate auditor’s report) and how these establishments (gas stations, mini-marts, convenience stores, etc.) are much more apt to sell to minors. But, in addition, you should know that the current system (state-run liquor stores) are not only closely regulated but also brings in about $350 million to state and local governments for core services like education, health care, human services, police and fire fighters. The Office of Finance Management says the I-1100 would cost the state and local governments $275 million over 5 years and I-1105 would reduce revenue by more than $750 million. The Center for Human Services would lose approximately $26,000 from the City of Shoreline alone that goes toward providing substance abuse treatment to youth and adults. I urge a “NO” vote on these.

Initiative 1107

This initiative would repeal the small, mostly temporary tax on non-essential items like candy, soda, bottled water and gum. I admit that there are some issues about this existing tax around what is taxed and what is exempted from being taxed, but human services cannot afford for this tax to be repealed. The money that is raised by the tax goes to fund schools, health care, and human services. This initiative is almost entirely sponsored by the American Beverage Association (the national lobbying arm of the big soda companies). A “no” vote is a vote for your community.

Initiative 1053

This initiative established a “two thirds” rule on any revenue-raising bills. In other words, it gives a small minority (17 legislators) the ability to prevent the majority from taking action on a responsible, balanced approach to the budget. If I-1053 had been in place this year, more families would have been cut from the Basic Health Plan and lost health care coverage for their children. Please vote “no”.

My hope is that everyone will read the “for” and “against” statements in the voters guide very carefully to understand the real impacts of voting for them. 


Read more...

Lake Forest Park council candidates answer questions at Third Place Commons candidate forum October 7

Monday, October 25, 2021

Both the candidate forum and the Prop 1 forum
are available online
By Pam Cross

On Thursday, October 7, 2021 Third Place Commons presented the Lake Forest Park City Council Candidate Forum, in partnership with the League of Women Voters - Seattle/King County. 

All seven candidates for the four city council positions participated, and shared their thoughts on a wide variety of topics including Prop 1, increasing affordable housing options, and the future of Town Center.

The forum was moderated by Chelsea Jordan from the League of Women Voters - Seattle / King County.

The candidates did not receive the questions beforehand and were given from 1 to 2 minutes to respond. The candidates were randomly called on so that no one had an advantage.

What three things would you do to improve or deepen a safe and strong community?

The most frequently mentioned was improving accessibility through a comprehensive sidewalk plan starting with the areas around schools. The cut-through traffic has to be addressed using traffic calming methods. The City needs to be more walkable and bikeable and needs more street lights.

Candidates expressed a need for expanded services to complement the RADAR program for those who need mental health assistance or suffer from domestic violence. There is potential funding for a North End crisis center that would provide the immediate help that RADAR cannot provide.

It was pointed out that local control of the Police and Fire Departments requires proper funding; we should pay attention to what the Northshore FD is planning; and gathering places are important and needed in LFP.

Other items that were raised included the need for cooling/warming stations because of the more extreme weather caused by Climate Change, increasing neighborhood involvement through a Neighborhood Watch program, and a locking mailboxes program partly subsidized by City.

The LFP Council has placed a property tax levy on the Nov Ballot to fund improvements for sidewalks, pedestrians and bicycles, parks increasing taxes $.59/1,000.

What is your position on Prop 1 and what would you do to support it if passes, and what are your thoughts on supporting parks if it does not pass?


The candidates were generally in support of Prop 1 with one dissenting view.

Maddy Larson (Position 5) put it this way: this is a complicated issue. Everybody wants it, but the mechanism is frustrating to voters that there’s not more specificity in what it would fund. And it does not have a time limit to end this tax. We need to start somewhere - we need to start making progress on these infrastructure issues. I will work with Council to make sure the funds are spent with a community voice present, projects are clearly planned and budgeted, and that we make meaningful progress. If it doesn’t pass, we will have to find another funding source.

All of the candidates commented that funding was the area of most concern. They recognized that we need to make the investments and until we have some money to invest, no bank is going to bond us. Right now interest rates are low.

No one likes to raise taxes for the sake of raising taxes without compelling justification. These are the things voters support. There are very good safeguards built into Prop 1 so that funds will go into designated account and will be used only for pedestrian safety and parks. It can’t be raided for general purpose expenditures.

Semra Riddle (Position 1), who is currently on the Council and running unopposed, supports Prop 1. Resolution 1810 spells out how the funds will be spent. The money can’t be spent until there’s an implementation plan. Council is working on the implementation plan right now which requires work by staff, public outreach, and a public hearing as part of the normal process. We have tried other funding sources in the past for safe routes to schools and we have missed the mark every time. And these projects we’ve asked for are basically shovel ready. They’re just not big enough to rise to the top. If it doesn’t pass, we’re really going to have to think about how we’re coming back with a smaller levy because going out for grants and State money hasn’t been successful for these types of projects.

The dissenting opinion came from candidate Jon Lebo (Position 3).

I’m a strong supporter of parks, sidewalks and safety but I think we’re a bit premature. I have years of experience managing construction projects in the public sector. We’ve always put together a very detailed list of priorities and we’ve gone through a funding cycle and we have looked at sources, costs, and budget. I will vote no because I don’t think they’ve outlined enough detail in the priorities, the costs, and what they really want to achieve. There are many ways to provide safe access. The implementation plan should have been developed before going to the voters. You need to go to the voters with a strong program of what you’re going to do, and how you’re going to do it.

The next question: What is your vision for the future of Town Center Third Place Commons, and how would you achieve that?

Larry Goldman (Position 7) stated that the zoning regulations are a reasonable compromise by bringing in some residential with some affordable housing, but not so much that it overwhelms the infrastructure. We still need space for our Farmers Market, and community gathering spaces like we have now. There will be more opportunities for public input so we can balance affordable housing with a community focused center.

Other candidates mentioned that it’s a sensitive area because of the watershed. Some would like to see Town Center as a model for sustainable building, with lots of social services placed there, housing, and retail, and room for community gatherings. Use of solar, wind, and zero net carbon emissions are some ideas to model what we want to see in the rest of the community. The visibility to people outside the community lets them see what LFP is about. Our community wants a vibrant retail space with the character and feel of LFP. We need what is appropriate for LFP meaning low scale buildings, methods that improve the environment, more walkability - a place where people want to go. We need to find a developer that will do that.

A member of the audience asked: What concrete steps would you take about all of the noisy and racing cars?

All candidates agree that this is a big issue and needs to be a priority. It is critical to address this because it is in every neighborhood. We need to provide education in high schools and consider lobbying the state legislature for support in things like allowed signage.

Paul Sanford (Position 7) This is a big one. I think you have to start with police enforcement. We have a strong police force today but they are limited in where they can get and how quickly they can get there. I think we need to put together a special hotline or special conduit forum so people can directly contact a response at all hours of the day. A lot of concerns to address. We can look at cameras, and temporary calming traffic measures to disrupt these activities.

Tracy Furutani (Position 5). Agrees that data gathering is important and neighbors are the best way to get the information. We need one central repository to identify the area and emphasize those areas. We also have to decide whether this is local problem or a regional problem. If it’s regional, let’s partner with our neighbor cities to work on roads that lead into LFP.

Others pointed out that there are a couple of areas that are all known for racing. They are ripe for speed bumps - even temporary ones that are less expensive. Maybe the neighborhood would be willing to contribute to city funds. Let’s consider using inexpensive deterrents such as speed bumps, reducing the speed limits citywide, signage

In response to an audience question about affordable housing, the candidates supported ADUs because they provide a gentle increase in density. They also reduce the likelihood of loss of tree canopy. Another suggestion was cluster housing.

There were other questions from the audience as well as closing statements from the candidates. 

View the entire candidate forum HERE



Read more...
ShorelineAreaNews.com
Facebook: Shoreline Area News
Twitter: @ShorelineArea
Daily Email edition (don't forget to respond to the Follow.it email)

  © Blogger template The Professional Template II by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP