Showing posts with label city council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label city council. Show all posts

Agenda for Shoreline council meeting Monday, June 13, 2022

Wednesday, June 8, 2022

Shoreline City Council 2022
The agenda for the June 13, 2022 Shoreline City Council Regular meeting includes two study items.

Study Item 8(a) Discussion on Tenant Protection Regulations

The staff report will be presented by Jim Hammond, Intergovernmental Program Manager.

This staff report will provide a broad overview of the current state of tenant protection at the state level and in communities around King County, with the goal of providing to Council a baseline of information on the topic.

Among topics to be discussed are: 
  • number of days notice for rent increases;
  • cap on late fees;
  • Cap on move-in fees;
  • Right to a payment plan for up-front fees (deposit, first/last month’s rent);
  • Alteration of rent due date;
  • Barring discrimination due to immigrant status;
  • Barring requirement of a social security number;
  • Providing relocation assistance to low-income tenants
  • Prohibiting criminal background checks.
Staff will be asking Council to direct staff on further steps, if any, to take toward developing tenant protections within the City of Shoreline.

Study Item 8(b) 10 Year Financial Sustainability Plan Update: Strategy #7 – Levy Lid Lift Renewal

The staff report will be presented by Sara Lane, Administrative Services Director.

In November 2001, Washington State voters passed Initiative 747. This limited the increase in the City of Shoreline’s levy by the lesser of one percent or the percentage increase in the implicit price deflator (IPD). Even though this ballot measure was found to be unconstitutional, the State met in a special session and reinstated the one percent/IPD limitation (Ch. 1, Laws of 2007, sp. sess.).

The City Manager engaged the Financial Sustainability Advisory Committee-2022 (FSAC-22) in early 2022. FSAC-22 met six times between March 10 and May 19, 2022. The results are, in part:
  • The City Council should place a measure on the November 2022 ballot for a Levy Lid Lift.
  • The Levy Lid Lift should seek to maintain the current level of City services.
  • Committee members had differences of opinion on if the Levy Lid Lift should expand services to address emerging issues;
  • The committee did not come to an agreement on a recommended first year Levy Lid Lift rate.
The Consent Calendar

You may have noticed that several items discussed at the Council Meetings are scheduled to come back on the Consent Calendar. This part of the agenda is used to expedite meetings and reserve time for matters that need to be discussed further. Items on the Consent Calendar are generally non-controversial items that do not require much, if any, discussion. Use of the Consent Calendar allows the Council to group such items together under one heading and vote on them at one time.

If there is an item on the Consent Calendar that Council decides needs additional discussion, a Councilmember can request a change to the Agenda that an item be removed from consent to an action item. That is done during the Approval of the Agenda. This enables the item to be considered and voted upon separately.

There are six items on the Consent Calendar.

CONSENT CALENDAR

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of May 23, 2022


 

 

Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 23, 2022


 

 

 

 

 

(b)

Approval of Expenses and Payroll as of May 27, 2022 in the Amount of $5,477,441.84


 

 

 

 

 

(c)

Appointment of Parks Recreation Cultural Services/Tree Board Youth Members


 

 

 

 

 

(d)

Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Central Paving, LLC in the Amount of $1,230,161 for Construction of the N 155th Pavement Preservation Project


 

 

 

 

 

(e)

Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Kamins Construction in the Amount of $396,934 for the Ridgecrest Elementary Safe Routes to School Project


 

 

 

 

 

(f)

Approval of Multi-Family Tax Exemption Program Contract with Geo Properties LLC for the Geo 2 Project Located at 1122 N 180th Street


 


Go to this page to participate in the meeting, including making comments, and joining via Zoom.

--Pam Cross


Read more...

Agenda for Shoreline Council meeting June 6, 2022

Wednesday, June 1, 2022

Shoreline City Council 2022

Monday, June 6, 2022, 7pm
Council Chamber · Shoreline City Hall
17500 Midvale Ave N, Shoreline WA 98133
This meeting is conducted in a hybrid manner with both in-person and virtual options to attend.

https://zoom.us/j/95015006341
253-215-8782 | Webinar ID: 950 1500 6341

The Agenda for the June 6, 2020 City of Shoreline Regular meeting includes two Actions items and two Study items.

Action Item 8(a) Action on Ordinance No. 967 – Authorizing the Use of Eminent Domain for Acquisition of Certain Real Property Located in the Richmond Beach Neighborhood at the South End of 27th Ave NW, identified as King County Tax Parcel No. 727810-0905 for Public Park Land

Presented by Margaret King, City Attorney

Staff recommends that Council adopt proposed Ordinance No. 967 authorizing the use of eminent domain for certain real property to expand the City’s park land providing shoreline access. Staff will continue to negotiate for a voluntary sale of the property and will return to Council if those negotiations fail prior to filing a petition of eminent domain in the King County Superior Court.

Action Item 8(b) Adoption of Ordinance No. 966 – Amending Shoreline Municipal Code Chapter 13.20 to Add a New Section SMC 13.20.060 – Deferred Underground Facilities

Presented by John Norris, Assistant City Manager

Tricia Juhnke, City Engineer

Required undergrounding of the electrical utility in the 148th St light rail area has been delayed by Seattle City Light’s (SCL) 5th Avenue Duct Bank Project. In early 2021, SCL informed Sound Transit and the City that it was pushing back the timing of this replacement project as it does not have the capital funding to complete the Duct Bank Project in coordination with the light rail project timeline. SCL estimates a 2027-2030 timeline instead of 2024. As a result, temporary above-ground 3-phase power is required in order to continue with the light rail project as well as private development in the station area.

On March 7, 2022 Ordinance 958, passed by Council, addressed the temporary construction of 3-phase power. On May 23, 2022 Council discussed proposed Ordinance No. 966, which provides for a new Section 13.20.060 of the SMC which would allow interim overhead power within a limited area if certain conditions are met. Proposed Section 13.20.060 SMC, titled Deferred Underground Facilities, allows for overhead electrical facilities (utility poles, wires, etc.) on an interim basis if a property owner needing new overhead electricity enters into a Deferred Underground Facilities Agreement with the City. This proposed Code section also codifies requirements for SCL related to the interim overhead electrical facilities. Council is scheduled to take action on proposed Ordinance No. 966.

Study Item 9(a) Discussion of ShoreLake Arts Funding Request in Support of an Artspace Market Study for Affordable Artist Housing/Space Project in Shoreline

Presented by Debbie Tarry, City Manager

ShoreLake Arts engaged Artspace, the national leader in developing space for artists and arts organizations, to do a Preliminary Feasibility study on the potential for an Artspace-type project in Shoreline. The envisioned project would create both a permanent home for ShoreLake Arts and 40 to 75 units of affordable housing for artists. Artspace released the final Preliminary Feasibility Report in January 2022.

The final report found a demand for both an Arts Center to house community arts events and art education programming and affordable artist housing, and that the project should be in Shoreline. The next required step in the Artspace project includes a market study ($35,000) and project refinement workshop ($12,500). Artspace advised ShoreLake Arts to find funding to begin the Market Study by September 2022. On May 6, 2022, ShoreLake Arts sent a letter to the City requesting City funding of $20,000 to $25,000 to help fund the next steps.

The current request from ShoreLake Arts is for the City to provide up to $25,000 in funding for the Artspace market study and project refinement workshop. The $25,000 would come from the General Fund fund balance that is more than the amount required by City policy. Staff recommends that Council authorize up to $25,000 for this one-time allocation.

Study Item 9(b) Discussion of Ordinance No. 968 – Amending Chapters 20.30, 20.40, and 20.50 of the Shoreline Municipal Code to Modify Regulations for Development Within the MUR-70’ Zoning District

Presentation by Andrew Bauer, Planning Manager

With several years having passed since City Council adoption of the two light rail station subarea plans and initial development code regulations, opportunities have been identified to refine the MUR-70’ zone to better facilitate implementation of the plans. Stemming from the discussion at the October 25, 2021 joint meeting between the City Council and Planning Commission, the Planning Commission has continued work on Development Code amendments that would:

Establish provisions to reduce off-street parking requirements up to 50%, with approval of a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan; and

Revise the process and requirements by which development may achieve the maximum allowable building height of 140 feet by removing the requirement for a Development Agreement.

Staff will present the Planning Commission’s recommended MUR-70’ zone development code amendments.

Read more...

Notes from Shoreline Council meeting May 23, 2022

Sunday, May 29, 2022

Pam Cross, reporter
Shoreline City Council Meeting
May 23, 2022

Notes by Pam Cross

The remote meeting was called to order at 7:00pm by Mayor Scully.

All Councilmembers were present.

Approval of the Agenda

CM Roberts requests removal of item 7(i) from the Consent Calendar
“Adoption of Resolution No. 491 - Repealing Resolution No. 459 – Temporarily Authorizing Meetings and Public Hearings to be Held Electronically Due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency”

Item 7(i) is removed from the Consent Calendar and made Action 8(a)

Revised agenda approved by unanimous consent.

Report of the City Manager, Debbie Tarry
Presented by Ms. Tarry

Coffee with the Chief.
There will be more events like this at different locations throughout the year.
 

Low tides - Waterproof footwear is recommended


Support Shoreline’s Farmers Market at its new location
Leashed dogs are welcome


Shoreline Walks
Open to all ages and abilities
No need to sign up in advance
Leashed dogs welcome


State of the City Breakfast
Please RSVP because space is limited.


Public Reminders

The Planning Commission meeting originally scheduled for June 2 has been cancelled.

In honor of Memorial Day, City Hall will be clsed on Monday, May 30. There will be no Council meeting.

The next Council meeting will be held on Monday, June 6.

Council Reports

CM Ramsdell
I attended the Shoreline Rotary Club breakfast meeting. I was impressed with the Homestead Community Land Trust program. The Trust supplies affordable homeowner opportunities for those earning 50 - 80% of AMI. The Trust owns the land and the homeowner purchases the structure that can be purchased for between $224,000 and $338,000.

I also attended the Westminster Triangle Neighborhood Group Meet. They discussed the development of the park.

And I attended a meeting with the staff and Board members of the North Urban Human Services Alliance (NUHSA). Their primary concern is the future of The Oaks Enhanced Shelter. The current contract ends in 2023 and they are finding it a little frustrating trying to find out from Catholic Community Services about the future of it.

DM Robertson
I’ll give a brief update on the Regional Transit Committee. Metro ridership is up 20% from last year. The new ORCA card launched on May 16. You don’t need a new card. You can connect your ORCA Card to the new myORCA app or manage your account at myORCA.com.
They are going to be talking about reducing fares for youth on Metro to zero. The rest of the discussion was about Metro Connects as part of the regional plan.

CM McConnell
I attended the Zoom meeting for the domestic violence (DV) initiative a few weeks ago. It was very promising that there are resources out there but access to them is broken because of language and cultural barriers. Victims will file DV claims but then they don’t follow through with the rest of the sequence through the legal system because they don’t know how to. We need attorneys acting as advocates to guide victims through the following steps for restraining orders etc.

I want to mention that I attended the ShoreLake Arts Gala with almost every member of the Council who should be patting themselves on the back. The last number I heard from the silent auction was $60,000.

CM Mork
I attended the Elected Officials K4C, the King County Climate Change Consortium Town Hall which was led by KingCo Councilmember Rod Dembowski. The main topics were the addition of two new cities (Bothell and Maple Valley) to the Consortium. We also discussed at length Vision Zero and its ultimate goal of no deaths or serious injuries on roadways using road safety reform.

Mayor Scully
I attended the meeting of the Lake Ballinger Forum. We had an exciting presentation by WSDOT about making the creek that leads up to Lake Ballinger salmon-accessible by putting access under I-5, which is a pretty impressive project using a boring machine since there no way to cut and cover on I-5. Concerns about potential flooding will have to be addressed.

Also Representative Jayapal has included funding for our Ballinger Creek potential restoration project as part of her funding request to the White House. That would make that particular creek fish-passable up to Brugger’s Bog. This is just step one but this is an exciting start.

Public Comment
Each speaker allowed 2 minutes. There were 166 written comments at the time this report was prepared. Many speakers had also provided written comments.

The following speakers commented on item 9(c) Discussion of Acquisition of Certain Real Property for Public Park Land

Opposed to City Acquisition
Richard Kink, Shoreline
Bryan Chow, Shoreline
Jim McCurdy, Shoreline
Nathan Beard, Shoreline, President of Richmond Beach Preservation Assn
Dave Barnett, Shoreline, Chairman of the Cowlitz Indian Tribe
Randy Stime, Shoreline
Forrest Taylor, Shoreline
David Spellman, on behalf of the property owner Peter Vitaliano

In favor of City Acquisition
Sandra Gillette, Shoreline
Jack Malek, Shoreline
Tom Wyatt, Shoreline
Tom McCormick, Shoreline
Tom Petersen, Shoreline

Other topics
Theresa LaCroix, Edmonds, Director of Shoreline/LFP Senior Center
Thanks for continued support of the Senior Center

Kathleen Russell, Shoreline, Save Shoreline Trees
Item 9(b) Staffing request. Requested list of projects

Derek Blackwell
Opposed to proposed apartment on Linden Ave N

Approval of the Consent Calendar as amended.
The amended Consent Calendar was approved unanimously.

Action Item 8(a) Resolution No. 491 - Repealing Resolution No. 459 – Temporarily Authorizing Meetings and Public Hearings to be Held Electronically Due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency

Presented by Margaret King, City Attorney

Summary of Legislative Actions


Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution 491 repealing Resolution 459 and return to in-person meetings effective June 1, 2022.

PUBLIC COMMENT
This is required because this item is on the Agenda for the first time without prior notice.

No comments.

DISCUSSION

Motion and second to adopt the Resolution.

There has been much more public participation since we have had remote meetings. This will also allow a hybrid meeting so that Councilmembers who are unable to attend, and for the public who are unable to attend in person or may prefer to attend electronically via Zoom.

Does staff expect in-person attendance be similar to what we’ve had in the past? (About 100 people)
  • Reply Debbie Tarry: We have not discussed capacity in the Council meetings but we would like to spread the chairs apart a little bit more. Historically, when we’ve been at capacity in Chambers we have allowed additional attendees to participate in the lobby and provided seating.
Will electronic attendees who wish to give public comment have to sign up well in advance of the meeting like they do now?
  • Reply Debbie Tarry: Probably so that we can coordinate the speakers. If that changes we will let the public know in advance.
What about Covid protocol and masks?
  • Reply Debbie Tarry: When the mask mandate was dropped Statewide, we stopped requiring masks at City Hall. We do encourage people to wear masks. At this time we plan to take that same approach in Council Chambers.
  • We expect and encourage continued remote participation even though some of the details are still being worked out.
Does this Resolution apply the same way to the Planning Commission and the Parks Board in requiring mandatory in-person attendance unless there is a State of Emergency that says we cannot come?
  • Reply Margaret King: No. What it does is “undo” the mandate and allow a hybrid meeting so attendance of members or the public can be done remotely or in-person.
  • Reply Jessica Simulcik-Smith, City Clerk: Council Chambers has had the hybrid equipment installed and our other conference rooms are on the schedule to be installed soon. Currently we have been facing a back-order of critical equipment.
  • Reply Mayor Scully: At our retreat this was something we discussed and we decided Councilmembers are free to decide for themselves whether and how often they choose to participate in person or remotely. I believe this will extend to other boards.
VOTE
Motion passes unanimously by a vote of 7-0.

Action Item 8(b) PUBLIC HEARING and Discussion on Ordinance No. 965 – Extension of the Interim Regulations Authorizing Outdoor Seating on Private Property and Within Approved Public Rights-of-Way

Presented by Andrew Bauer, Planning Manager

On July 27, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 895, enacting interim regulations for outdoor seating areas for existing restaurants and bars due to indoor seating restrictions in place at that time related to the COVID-19 pandemic. These regulations include expedited permit review and waiver of fees. Council has adopted three extensions of the interim regulations during the course of the pandemic. Although most restrictions associated with the pandemic have been lifted, a fourth and final six-month extension is necessary as the Planning Commission continues their work on Development Code amendments for permanent regulations.

PUBLIC HEARING
No comments

DISCUSSION

This is a great idea and I wish there was more participation. We lack a downtown area like Edmonds has, but as our city develops around the light rail, there will be more areas where this can evolve.

I supported this in the past and look forward to making it permanent.

Councilmembers agree to this returning to Council on the Consent Calendar.

Study Item 9(a) Discussion of Ordinance No. 966 – Amending Shoreline Municipal Code Chapter 13.20 to Add a New Section SMC 13.20.060 – Deferred Underground Facilities

Presented by John Norris, Assistant City Manager

Required undergrounding of the electrical utility in the 148th St light rail area has been delayed by Seattle City Light’s (SCL) 5th Avenue Duct Bank Project. In early 2021, SCL informed Sound Transit and the City that it was pushing back the timing of this replacement project as it does not have the capital funding to complete the Duct Bank Project in coordination with the light rail project timeline. SCL estimates a 2027-2030 timeline instead of 2024. As a result, temporary above-ground 3-phase power is required in order to continue with the light rail project as well as private development in the station area.

On March 7, 2022 Ordinance 958, passed by Council, addressed the temporary construction of 3-phase power. Tonight Council will consider overhead interim operation 3-phase power until the first 10 blocks of the SCL 5th Ave Duct Bank Project is complete. This will require a new section to the code.


Seattle City Light, as the electrical utility service provider, will be required to:Ensure that interim poles are designed and constructed to not preclude future full development of adjacent sites
Upon completion of undergrounding, remove the interim poles and wires within proscribed timelines
Comply with provided enforcement provisions

Because other utilities (such as fiber optic or cable companies) will be using these poles, SCL requested that the other utilities be allowed enough time to remove their cables so that SCL can then remove the poles in a timely way. Staff has proposed an amendment to address this.

DISCUSSION

DUFA (see above slide) includes MUR 45 zones. But in the ordinance adopted earlier this year, we limited temporary above-ground to MUR 70. Do we need to go back and revisit that to include MUR 45?
  • Reply: Staff did discuss this. It is most likely that applicants for a DUFA would take an interim power pole that would be allowed and utilize that on an operational basis. The temporary construction power poles are only allowed in MUR 70. Council could go back and expand into the MUR 45. Or scale back DUFA to not include MUR 45. But the latter would preclude development in adjacent MUR 45 until the 4th Ave Duct Bank project is completed.
We’re not voting on DUFA tonight, right?
  • Reply: Correct.
Normally SCL is renting space on their poles to a variety of different utilities. There is nothing in our code prohibiting these rentals. Will SCL be renting the space during the temporary above-grounding?
  • Reply: Yes. Some of these poles may replace existing single-phase poles, so it is likely that the different utilities will be on these interim poles.
I have a question about the specific amendment and the original draft. They talk about two different things - the completed capital project and then the connection. Can the connection occur before the project is complete? In theory, of course. Should there be some clarity about the timing of the end of it all?
  • Reply: Great point. The intent is that once the underground project is energized - when the connection is made - they can then stop using the overhead poles to energize whatever future development or project. At that point the overhead wires can be removed by SCL, and then the other renting utilities remove their wires. Following that, SCL (that owns the poles) will come in and remove them. We will take a closer look at the wording we have used to make sure we are clear and not confusing the terminology.
This will return to Council as an Action item on June 6.

Study Item 9(b) Discussion of Ordinance 964 - Revenue Supported Permit Staffing Request

Presented by Rachael Markle, AICP, PandCD Director
Tricia Juhnke, P.E., City Engineer

Due to the increase in volume and complexity of permits for developments in the station areas and the Town Center, there are not sufficient staffing resources to process permit applications within a reasonable time frame.

The most complex permit types from application intake to permit issuance require equally complex skill sets for staff. We are talking about permits for projects such as new mixed-use, multi-family, commercial, Deep Green Incentive Program projects, Affordable Housing projects and projects within Critical Areas.

This issue needs immediate attention to address the current and anticipated permit processing backlog at the current staffing level. Staff recommends adding six regular staff positions. So we are seeking a budget amendment to hire additional staff for permitting processing.


Additional details are in the staff report. The following slide is a correction to the one in the staff report that failed to carry over the costs that are proposed to be paid for from the wastewater utility.


DISCUSSION

You mentioned that revenue from permits will pay for these positions in the foreseeable future. Do you think this is a sustainable source of funding?
  • Reply: We will be doing projections for the biennial budget. Current projects in the timeline should sustain us until 2025. From pre-application meetings there have also been indications of future projects that are in the works. So these are likely to happen after 2025. Of course the further you go out, the murkier it gets because there are many variables.
  • Reply Debbie Tarry: We have also been in the process of updating our 10-year forecast and we believe that this is sustainable funding through the next two bienniums. However, these positions are funded through development and should we see a marked decline in development we would have to review staffing. Additionally we get a large part of the revenue up front.
We have also seen a lot of permits for remodeling of residences and I know that when you are remodeling, and you have to wait for a permit every week feels like a very long time and to potentially see that time double is difficult.

I planned to add a deck to my house and was told it would be a 17 week wait for the permit to be approved. We were looking forward to having the deck this summer.

I’ve been hearing more frustration about permit wait-times than I have sidewalks and trees - and that’s saying something.

This will come back as an Action item on July 25.

Study Item 9(c) Discussion of Ordinance No. 967 – Authorizing the Use of Eminent Domain for Acquisition of Certain Real Property identified as King County Tax Parcel No. 727810-0905 for Public Park Land

CM McConnell recused herself from this discussion and stated that she has not participated in any Executive Sessions regarding it. CM McConnell lives on the street in question.

Presented by Margaret King, City Attorney

In or about 2020, the City of Shoreline elected not to seek to acquire property at the southern end of 27th Avenue NW when it came up for sale. The property for sale included not only a residence but also a large parcel of 2nd Class Tidelands.

Except for the 2nd Class Tidelands associated with Richmond Beach Saltwater park, Puget Sound shoreline is in private ownership, primarily Burlington Northern right-of-way.

Acquisition of this parcel would provide a continuous public connection to these tidelands, and preserve this area in its natural state. Acquisition would also facilitate the public survey response for more shoreline and beach access and increase the City’s inventory of park land.

Staff would like Council to consider proposed Ordinance No. 967 (use of eminent domain) as a precautionary step in the event a voluntary sale of the tideland parcel cannot be achieved.

Citizen interest in acquiring the tideland portion of the properties has continued as the City has actively been engaged in acquiring public park land throughout the City.

The City consultant has contacted the property owner with the objective of negotiating with the owner, using eminent domain only after efforts are exhausted.

DISCUSSION

There appears to be some question about who owns 27th Ave.
  • Reply: I do not have clarification of that issue tonight. That would be a separate issue from tonight’s discussion.
Is safe access to this particular area of beach only by using 27th Ave or by crossing the railroad tracks and across the rocks?
  • Reply Debbie Tarry: We have also made application to Burlington Northern to request lease access to their right-of-way that would allow people to traverse to this tideland when they’re coming from the north. We do not have an answer from Burlington Northern.
People can access this part of the park from the south through Saltwater Park.

All of the input from the public is greatly appreciated.

I support moving ahead with this in order to provide safer access.

Is part of this ordinance regarding parking on 27th? Some speakers mentioned they did not want parking there.
  • Reply: No, it is not. This simply authorizes the use of eminent domain for purchase of the property if other negotiations fail.
Some speakers said the City did not follow regular process for this. Can you comment about that?
  • Reply: the City has followed all of the requirements with respect to moving forward with an ordinance with respect to exercising eminent domain. We very closely follow the process set out by State law. Some people want more public outreach and neighborhood discussions, but that is not a legal requirement. We have met all of the legal requirements.
It’s a tradition of the community as well as people from outside of the community, to walk along this beach. I have made this traditional walk along the beach a number of times. The previous owner of the property in question allowed access to the tidelands, but no longer lives there. The current owner does not want to allow access. I believe shorelines should be part of the public domain. We accomplish that by providing fair market value - we don’t take anything from anybody - we pay full price. I am pleased the current owner allows tribal members on there, but I don’t want this tradition to be taken away from the rest of us. This has been used as a public beach for a very long time. We are not proposing an expansion here, just a continuation of the existing use.

This is scheduled to come back June 6 as an Action Item.

MEETING ADJOURNED.



Read more...

Agenda for Shoreline council meeting May 23, 2022 - including public hearing

Tuesday, May 17, 2022

The agenda for the May 23, 2022 regular meeting of the Shoreline City Council includes one Action item and three Study items.

Action Item 8(a) PUBLIC HEARING and Discussion on Ordinance No. 965 – Extension of the Interim Regulations Authorizing Outdoor Seating on Private Property and Within Approved Public Rights-of-Way

On July 27, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 895, enacting interim regulations for outdoor seating areas for existing restaurants and bars due to indoor seating restrictions in place at that time related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Council has adopted three extensions of the interim regulations during the course of the pandemic. Although most restrictions associated with the pandemic have been lifted, a fourth and final six-month extension is necessary as the Planning Commission continues their work on Development Code amendments for permanent regulations.

Council will hold the required public hearing and discuss the proposed additional extension. Those who wish to speak will be provided public comment time following the staff presentation and prior to the Council’s discussion.

Study Item 9(a) Discussion of Ordinance No. 966 – Amending Shoreline Municipal Code Chapter 13.20 to Add a New Section SMC 13.20.060 – Deferred Underground Facilities

Required undergrounding of the electrical utility in the 148th St light rail area has been delayed by Seattle City Light’s (SCL) 5th Avenue Duct Bank Project. In early 2021, SCL informed Sound Transit and the City that it was pushing back the timing of this replacement project as it does not have the capital funding to complete the Duct Bank Project in coordination with the light rail project timeline. SCL estimates a 2027-2030 timeline instead of 2024. As a result, temporary above-ground 3-phase power is required in order to continue with the light rail project as well as private development in the station area. Council will discuss the proposed amendments to the municipal code.

Study Item 9(b) Discussion of Revenue Supported Permit Staffing Request

Due to the increase in volume and complexity of permits for developments in the station areas and the Town Center, there are not sufficient staffing resources to process permit applications within a reasonable time frame. This issue needs immediate attention to address the current and anticipated permit processing backlog at the current staffing level. Staff recommends adding six regular staff positions to address this issue.

Study Item 9(c) Discussion of Ordinance No. 967 – Authorizing the Use of Eminent Domain for Acquisition of Certain Real Property identified as King County Tax Parcel No. 727810-0905 for Public Park Land

In or about 2020, the City of Shoreline elected not to seek to acquire property at the southern end of 27th Avenue NW when it came up for sale. The property for sale included not only a residence but also a large parcel of 2nd Class Tidelands. Citizen interest in acquiring the tideland portion of the properties has continued as the City has actively been engaged in acquiring public parkland throughout the City. The City Council has expressed interest in acquiring the tidelands so as to expand the area of City public parks with shoreline access.

Acquisition of this parcel would provide a continuous public connection to these tidelands, and preserves this area in its natural state. Acquisition would also facilitate the public survey response for more shoreline and beach access and increase the City’s inventory of park land.

Staff would like Council to consider proposed Ordinance No. 967 (use of eminent domain) as a precautionary step in the event a voluntary sale of the tideland parcel cannot be achieved.

View meeting, make comments...



Read more...

Notes from Shoreline council meeting May 9, 2022

Friday, May 13, 2022

Pam Cross, reporter
Shoreline City Council Meeting
May 9, 2022

Notes by Pam Cross

The remote meeting was called to order at 7:00pm by Mayor Scully.

All Councilmembers were present.

Proclamations
I, Keith Scully, Mayor of the City of Shoreline, on behalf of the Shoreline City Council, do hereby proclaim May 21, 2022, as ARMED SERVICES APPRECIATION DAY in the City of Shoreline.

Approval of the Agenda
The agenda was approved by unanimous consent.

Report of the City Manager, Debbie Tarry
Presented by Ms. Tarry

Spartan Recreation Center Display

Thanks to community volunteer Linda Tsai, for creating a wonderful resource wall of opportunities, and Gidget Terpstra for sharing her collection of Japanese Dolls.

Contact Suni Tolton for additional information: stolton@shorelinewa.gov

PRCS/Tree Board has extended deadline for applications:


Take the Survey and have your say:


In spite of the picture, you may want to dress for rain:


Public Reminders UPDATE

The City Council Regular Meeting scheduled for Monday, May 16, 2022 has been cancelled.

The next meeting of the City Council will be held on Monday, May 23, 2022, with a Special Meeting at 5:30pm and a Regular Meeting at 7:00pm, both held remotely on Zoom.

Council Reports


CM Pobee attended the Seashore Transportation Forum. It was a great meeting, especially at 7:30am. (Laughter) We looked at electric buses and climate goals. Metro is now looking at using a phased approach to move to all electric buses, and to be able to convey operations and acquire the workforce and build the necessary infrastructure to support 100% zero emissions by the fleet. Then we looked at SAFE (safety, security and fare enforcement) which is how they are trying to address safety and security.

CM Mork attended the Regional Water Quality Meeting. The County Executive has presented to the County Council a 5.75% proposed rate increase for sewage treatment. This would be billed to all municipalities that use West Point or Brightwater like we do. Appears it will be approved. The reasons include aging equipment, growth capacity, storm water and wastewater in Seattle, nutrient removal investment, system reliability and climate change. There are a long series of rate increases planned in order to accomplish this.

CM Mork also attended Climate Change K4C. A lot of discussion about Vision Zero and making people feel safe to walk and bike. Money is available from both the federal and state grants.

Public Comment

Each speaker allowed 3 minutes. There was one written comment at the time this report was prepared.

Item 8(a). TIP
Kathleen Russell, Shoreline, sidewalk on 20th NW will result in tree loss

400 unit Apartment building on Linden Ave N
Courtney Ewing, Shoreline provided moderashoreline.com for details
Derek Blackwell, Shoreline spoke about traffic problems

Approval of the Consent Calendar
The Consent Calendar was approved unanimously.

Action Item 8(a) Action on Resolution No. 489 - Adopting a Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) for 2023 Through 2028

Presentation by Nytasha Walters, Transportation Division Manager

In accordance with state law, the City is required to prepare a six-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). The City’s TIP is used to secure federal funding for transportation projects as part of the Statewide TIP.

The draft 2023-2028 TIP was presented to the City Council on April 11, 2022. The staff presentation was immediately followed by a Public Hearing on the plan, as required by state law (RCW 35.77.010).


Following the Public Hearing, Council had questions and concerns regarding the off-corridor bike network, sidewalks near schools, and funding for “small win” projects.

Staff is adding clarifying language to the Sidewalk Prioritization Plan to make sure that it is completely clear that Program No. 2 (New Sidewalk Plan) is for the whole Sidewalk Prioritization Plan, not just the top Prioritized Projects (12 sales and use funded projects that the voters approved).

DISCUSSION

Move and second to adopt Resolution 489


Thanks for listening to the community and Council, and addressing their concerns.

The clarifications make a lot of sense. I do think sidewalk prioritization matrix should be continuously updated due to changing traffic volumes and increased development in the station areas. I don’t think it should be updated only every 5 or so years.

During public comment, Ms. Russell questioned why and where do we have different sidewalk widths. This isn’t necessarily a part of the Motion, but some large sidewalks are in more local streets - not along principal arterials.
 
  • Reply: We take into account the adjacent land use as well as the activities that are going on in the area. Higher zoning requires wider sidewalks. Also if we are trying to combine pedestrian and bicycle activity on the same sidewalk (such as close to a light rail station), or there is a higher volume of activity. We are also looking at the continuity of the network.
  • Reply Randy Witt, Public Works Director: this is a good question but not quite on topic so we’re not fully prepared to answer. We can come back later if that’s acceptable.

I was looking for a general answer. How can the public and the Council look at these maps and these projects and have a sense of whether sidewalks will be 5’ or 8’ or wider?
  • Reply Debbie Tarry: I’m not sure that you can tell from the map. I do know that we provided a conceptual design framework for the 12 sidewalks that were approved by the voters. So there was some information about what could be considered in the future. But until we move into a higher level of design for each project we won’t know.

So the public needs to ask?
  • Reply Debbie Tarry: Yes, and we’ve been doing a lot of public outreach at the start of design.

VOTE
Motion passes unanimously 7-0.

Study Item 9(a) Discussion and Update of the 145th Street Corridor and I-5 Interchange Projects
  • Presentation by Randy Witt, Public Works Director
Other contributors to the presentation:
  • Cory Nau, City of Shoreline Engineer II Capital Projects, 145th St Corridor
  • John McKenzie, Jacobs Engineering, Project Manager 145th St Corridor
  • Rob McGaughey, Lochner Engineering, Project Manager I-5 Interchange Project Manager
Tonight we are going to update the City Council on the projects’ progress.

Cory Nau, 145th St Corridor (Corridor)

Phase 1 will be constructed concurrently with the interchange project.
We are just finishing up the Design stage. The major roadway work for the Corridor Phase 1 and the Interchange constructs in 2023 and 2024. The off-corridor bike network constructs towards the end of 2024, then Phase 2 in 2026 and 2027. Phase 3 likely constructs beyond 2029. This timeline is subject to change based on funding.

We have been able to secure funding to fully design and construct the Interchange Improvements project, and Phase 1 of the corridor. We have also secured funding for completion of the designs of Phases 2 and 3, and the off corridor bike network. Currently we are pursuing right-of-way funding for Phase 2 and we’re on the contingency list for construction funding for the off-corridor bike network.

John McKenzie, Project Manager, 145th St Corridor (Corridor)

145th is a key regional corridor. It provides connections to Aurora, I-5, and Lake City Way/Bothell Way. It also connects Shoreline and Seattle neighborhoods, businesses, parks and services. The future light rail station at NE 148th St and I-5 will be opening soon and this corridor will be of even more regional significance.

The purpose of the improvements to the Corridor is to address existing problems of traffic congestion, transit that does not accommodate people with disabilities, minimal amenities, narrow and partially blocked sidewalks that are difficult to negotiate for walkers and not accessible for people using wheelchairs. There is no place for bikes. It also suffers from a high number of collisions.

Project Goals
  1. Ensure that all modes are accommodated so that people can walk, bike, access transit, and drive reliably and comfortably through the Corridor.
  2. Address traffic congestion and delay
  3. Develop improvements that support the local economy, protect the environment, and support a vibrant community.
This slide highlights the complex multi-jurisdictional nature of the Corridor.


Rob McGaughey, Project Manager, I-5 Interchange (Interchange)

The Interchange project is tied to the revenue date for the Lynnwood Link extension which is July 2024. So that’s the opening date that we’re projecting for the Interchange. The Lynnwood Link BRT (Bus, Rapid Transit) project should start in 2025.


Some of the things that will be included in the Interchange are wider sidewalks (13’ on the north side and 8’ on the south side of 145th shown in pink). There will be six flashing rapid beacons at each crosswalk. There are also pedestrian refuge areas, and a two-way bike path above I-5 (green line).

We have been working with Sound Transit to make the Interchange project compatible with the Lynnwood Link. This has involved some redesign work to coordinate with contracts ST has ready to go.

Interchange utility coordination is required to work with Seattle Public Utilities, Seattle City Light, underground aerial communications lines, relocating Lumen duct bank, as well as Puget Sound Energy.

To minimize the impacts during construction, we will keep one lane open in each direction (reduced capacity) and the intersection open during construction. There will still be substantial impact and some overnight closures. Uniformed police officers and contractor flaggers will be there during peak traffic times.

(Plays short video of planned project.) This will be available for viewing at the Virtual Open House


DISCUSSION

As you stated, it has been a little while since we’ve talked about this. This is helpful and is appreciated especially since many people have concerns about transitioning to a roundabout.
  • Reply Randy Witt: we have planned outreach about how to navigate a roundabout.
How long is the total impact going to be?
  • Reply Rob McGaughey: We are projecting 16 months for construction of the Interchange. Should be open about April 2024.
16 months will be challenging for drivers. Thanks for the letting us know how it will be addressed.

Study Item 9(b) Discussion of City Manager Recruitment Firm

Presentation by Debbie Tarry

As you know, I have announced my intent to retire effective November 2, 2022. In order to allow for a smooth transition and Council selection of a new City Manager, I want to bring to you tonight some options for your consideration.

The City has historically used both Prothman and Raftelis for this position. I was able to get a proposal from Raftelis. Their project timeline allows us the time needed. It also includes a number of opportunities for the Council to meet with Raftelis and their representative Catherine Parrish. It provides time to get input from the public if Council desires, input from department directors, and recruitment on a nationwide basis, review of applicants, screening, and interview of finalists. The cost would be approximately $32,000 plus direct expenses.

Additional detail has been presented to Councilmembers.

Would Council like to move ahead with Raftelis? Or like a proposal from Prothman? Or do a Request for Proposal process open to all firms?

DISCUSSION

I’m supportive of moving ahead with Raftelis since we’ve worked with them before. There is value to working with someone who already knows Shoreline and what we consider important values.

Why aren’t there more in-person meetings set up in the calendar?
  • Reply: If Council desires more in-person, we can make that request. The interim steps of screening through review, Council’s desire to get more information and/or who they want to bring in to interview are anticipated to happen virtually. It depends on Council’s preference.
I’m OK with virtual, but I think we need more meetings with the applicants.
  • Reply: Sure. We can do that
I am impressed by Raftelis. And I also agree the interviews with the finalists should be in-person.

I agree that we need in-person interviews for the finalists. It is more costly but important to meet in person for such an important decision. I also agree that we need more interactions prior to determining the finalists that we interview. We have had as many as 30 applicants in the past. They were then whittled down to 15 by the recruitment firm. Two of us have been through this process before and it is really important since this is the only hiring we do for the City. New members need to be very comfortable with the process, even if it means more meetings and costs a little bit more since it’s going to be a national search.

I agree with staff recommendation.

My only concern is with the timeline. What if the finalists we meet in-person turn out to not be good fits? I would like to start earlier than June - as soon as possible.
  • Reply: I agree the earlier the better.
I agree, but remember once the call is out in publications etc., there’s a minimum timeframe that we have to put it out because if it’s too short it won’t be helpful in a national search.

Council recesses into an Executive Session. No final action is expected.


Meeting adjourned


Read more...

Agenda for Shoreline council meeting Monday May 9, 2022

Friday, May 6, 2022

Shoreline City Council 2022
The Shoreline City Council regular meeting for May 9, 2022 has one Action Item and two Study Items.

Prior to the regular meeting, the Council will take a driving tour to visualize the opportunity and need for connections along 3rd Ave NE between NE 149th St and NE 153rd St.

Information on viewing meetings and making comments can be found here.

Action Item 8(a) Action on Resolution No. 489 - Adopting a Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) for 2023 Through 2028

In accordance with state law, the City is required to prepare a six-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). The City’s TIP is used to secure federal funding for transportation projects as part of the Statewide TIP.

The draft 2023-2028 TIP was presented to the City Council on April 11, 2022. The staff presentation was immediately followed by a Public Hearing on the plan, as required by state law (RCW 35.77.010).

During the April 11 meeting, Councilmembers had questions and concerns that will be discussed at this meeting. Those concerns were regarding the off-corridor bike network, sidewalks near schools, and funding for “small win” projects.

Attachment A, Exhibit A to the staff report has been updated.

Study Item 9(a) Discussion and Update of the 145th Street Corridor and I-5 Interchange Projects

This discussion and presentation are intended to update the City Council on the projects’ progression, past and future milestones, including the current schedule for design completion, advertising for construction bids, and construction in 2023 and 2024.

No action is required. Staff recommends that Council ask questions and provide feedback on the projects and any modifications that Council would like considered as the projects proceed to final design.

Study Item 9(b) Discussion of City Manager Recruitment Firm

On May 3, 2022, the City Manager announced her intent to retire effective November 2, 2022. City Manager recruitments require specialized experience, knowledge, contacts, skills, outside objectivity, and time that are not usually available internally. 

It is staff’s view that outside assistance is essential for a successful recruitment, selection and retention of a new City Manager. Historically the City has used two recruitment firms for the recruitment of executive positions – Prothman and Raftelis (formerly Novak Consulting Group) – although Raftelis has conducted a few recruitments for the City more recently.

Staff recommends that Council provide direction to the City Manager regarding the proposed City Manager recruitment process and contract with Raftelis

--Pam Cross



Read more...

Notes from Shoreline council meeting May 2, 2022

Tuesday, May 3, 2022

Pam Cross, reporter
Shoreline City Council Meeting
May 2, 2022

Notes by Pam Cross

The remote meeting was called to order at 7:00pm by Mayor Scully.

Councilmember Roberts was excused for personal reasons.

Proclamations

I, Keith Scully, Mayor of the City of Shoreline, on behalf of the Shoreline City Council, hereby proclaim:

  • The month of May 2022 as NATIONAL BIKE MONTH in the City of Shoreline and encourage all people to celebrate the month of May by bicycling for recreation and transportation;
  • The month of May 2022, as MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS MONTH in the City of Shoreline;
  • The week of May 8 to May 14 is AFFORDABLE HOUSING WEEK in the City of Shoreline.

Approval of the Agenda
The agenda was approved by unanimous consent.

Report of the City Manager, Debbie Tarry
Presented by Ms. Tarry

COVID UPDATE


You can still find this information at covidvaccinewa.org

SHORELINE WALKS - Richmond Beach


SURVEY DEADLINE May 8


PRCS/Tree Board YOUTH MEMBERS
Applications due May 6 by 5pm


Public Reminders

May 5 Meetings


Council Reports
NONE

Public Comment

Each speaker allowed 3 minutes.
There were no written comments at the time this report was prepared.

The Oaks Enhanced Shelter Updates
Jackie Kurle, Shoreline

Fircrest Master Development Plan
Janet Way, Shoreline
Maralyn Chase, Shoreline

Affordable Housing in Shoreline
Heidi Shepherd, Shoreline (NUHSA Board Member)
Michelle Eastman, Shoreline (NUHSA member)

7-story Apartment planned for Linden Ave N loss of trees
Derek Blackwell, Shoreline

Approval of the Consent Calendar
The Consent Calendar was approved unanimously.

Meeting Adjourned



Read more...
ShorelineAreaNews.com
Facebook: Shoreline Area News
Twitter: @ShorelineArea
Daily Email edition (don't forget to respond to the Follow.it email)

  © Blogger template The Professional Template II by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP