tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5741412946805763929.post778893130636041215..comments2024-03-28T03:50:29.923-07:00Comments on Shoreline Area News: Planning Commission Public Hearing on 185th rezone and developmentCarl Dinsehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03741982015985286521noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5741412946805763929.post-29105979399680354702014-12-29T21:51:19.579-08:002014-12-29T21:51:19.579-08:00Tom - there was a C left out of the RCW. It is now...Tom - there was a C left out of the RCW. It is now corrected in the article. As far as original date of publication, I expect that people who are following topics closely will check the City webpage.DKHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04407480347227038860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5741412946805763929.post-3257921645885672362014-12-29T12:47:30.134-08:002014-12-29T12:47:30.134-08:00@soundoffshoreline The City has corrected the date...@soundoffshoreline The City has corrected the date on the linked document. . At least one other error in this notice remains: RCW 43.21.031 does not exist. The City will undoubtedly correct that as well. And while the City apparently posted the original notice on its website on Monday, Dec. 22, it was not published here on the SAN until after business hours on the following Friday. The damage is done. Effective public engagement by the City on this document has failed.<br /><br />Tom Jamiesonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5741412946805763929.post-61592793463224258772014-12-27T16:07:01.633-08:002014-12-27T16:07:01.633-08:00And nuts!! This notice is so ridiculous! Diane, ca...And nuts!! This notice is so ridiculous! Diane, can you please ask them why they can't just have all comments in at the hearing? Thanks!Janet Wayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16963938962898188967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5741412946805763929.post-20240518769365945842014-12-27T16:03:42.108-08:002014-12-27T16:03:42.108-08:00Very curious!Very curious!Janet Wayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16963938962898188967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5741412946805763929.post-86353435343486402722014-12-27T15:30:07.925-08:002014-12-27T15:30:07.925-08:00Very curious that this document lists the Jan. 2nd...Very curious that this document lists the Jan. 2nd deadline: http://shorelinewa.gov/home/showdocument?id=18933<br /><br />and this separate notice on the website lists Jan. 15th as the deadline: http://www.cityofshoreline.com/Home/Components/News/News/1858/21?backlist=%2f <br /><br />Surely, Jan 2nd must be a typo. If not, I would think that the City is at least obligated to honor the latter of the two dates or start the clock over on the Public Notice timeline. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5741412946805763929.post-51422974710529315542014-12-27T13:52:52.449-08:002014-12-27T13:52:52.449-08:00Greetings! It is completely unacceptable for the d...Greetings! It is completely unacceptable for the deadline for this hearing's written comments to be nearly 2 weeks before the hearing. Written comments should be accepted up to the actual hearing time and submitted into the record. Also, the Jan 2nd date is also bad being just one day after a holiday. <br /><br />Shoreline should make a much better effort to allow each and every possible comment for a Rezone around a Light rail Station almost 10 years off!<br /><br />Let the record show that the Shoreline Preservation Society strongly objects to this deadline. It is impinging on the citizens' rights to be informed and participate in providing vital information about the massive proposal put forward.Janet Wayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16963938962898188967noreply@blogger.com