![]() |
| The city owns the land where it proposes to place a community pool |
From the Puget Sound Business Journal
Shoreline lawmakers are pushing a measure on the November ballot that would deliver a new $100 million aquatic center, replacing a city-owned storage facility.
This is the city’s second attempt to finance an indoor pool following a failed 2019 ballot measure to create a new parks and pool bond.
“There’s a lot of disappointment that the previous bond did not pass,” Shoreline City Councilmember Chris Roberts said at Monday’s meeting. “Having a public facility is so important to the health and well-being of the community."
The City Council unanimously passed the resolution Monday night to put the measure on the ballot. If approved by voters, the measure would create a Metropolitan Park District with the same boundaries as the city of Shoreline to levy property taxes to build and maintain a new pool facility and future recreational centers.
The initial taxing rate is expected to be $0.55 per $1,000 and generate $8.8 million annually.
The approximately 48,000-square-foot indoor pool would replace the storage facility at 17828 Midvale Ave N, (close to Shoreline City Hall). The city’s previous 1970s-era pool closed in 2020 due to its age and the impact of the pandemic.
Planning for the project began in 2024. A preliminary design completed in February includes an eight-lane lap pool, a recreation pool with a lazy river feature, a hydrotherapy pool and a sauna. Additional space on the property could allow for another recreation facility, if funding becomes available, according to a staff report.
Construction costs are estimated at $61.2 million, as well as $22.2 million in “soft costs,” which include design and permitting fees.
The city owns the project site but would need to pay off $16.6 million in outstanding debt on the land.
A King County grant would provide $5 million for the project’s construction. Revenue from the new taxing district would fund the remaining $95 million.
User fees and rentals would recover 66% of the pool’s average annual operating costs, with the rest coming from property taxes, according to staff.
If voters approve the measure, construction would begin in the third quarter of 2028.
For more stories like this one, sign up for the Business Journal’s free morning and afternoon daily newsletters or download our free app.

Shoreline hasn’t been the same since we destroyed the pool.
ReplyDeleteI remember when they built it. I can't believe they ripped it out of there and now they're going to put one at the top of my dad's street. How does that make good financial sense ever?
DeleteThe state is broke. The county is broke. Our politicians come up with hundred million for pools, and a bicycle bridge that will serve a handful of people a yr.
ReplyDeleteCheck out the bicycle bridges in Totem Lake. They’re beautiful and it’s drawn me there to ride and spend my money. The Interurban trail at 205th is a joke. I want to see that beauty bridging Shoreline and Edmonds!
DeleteI truly hope this happens and I’ll vote for it even though I will rarely use it. I’m not holding my breath though, because voters in Shoreline are too stingy when it comes to paying for nice things. Would rather go to Lynnwood or MLT, I guess…
ReplyDeleteToo stingy? What ballot initiatives have we not passed recently? Please support your assertion.
DeleteIt would serve thousands of people, not "a handful"!
ReplyDeleteI don't mind the concept of a pool, but it needs to not be some high end thing as the sent us last time to vote on. It needs to match the needs of the community and not try and fill in some dream space that we cannot afford.
ReplyDeleteI would love a community pool, but not there! The parking in that area with the apartment building next door is already absolutely atrocious.
ReplyDeletewhat will all the people do with all the things they are storing at that location when it's closed to build a pool?
ReplyDeleteThey should renovate the old pool on 15th ave.
ReplyDeleteI could join a luxury gym for less than it will raise my taxes. So unless I get to use it for free that will be a no vote.
ReplyDeleteSchool district would save a lot not having to pay for the local high school swim and dive teams!
ReplyDeleteWe had a pool. We demolished it. Now we rebuild a pool. How does this work?!
ReplyDelete